eFactoryPro Wiki

7.11 What is the Asset Performance Snapshot and how do I use it?

Updated on

Steps in the screenshots correspond to the numbers in the headings.

Included as a separate report in the FMS Metrics Reports offerings is the Asset Performance Snapshot.  This report allows you to see, at-a-glance, an overall view of the machines that are causing you the greatest pain in your site.

1. Access the FMS Metrics report from either the Shared with Me menu (if you have a Consumer license) or from your Site Workspace (if you have a professional license.)

2. Under the FMS Metrics Reports you will find the Asset Performance Snapshot.  Click on that.

3. The page loads. There are three charts with a slicer next to each one to control the display.

4. As you can see from the top right corner, you are looking at only Critical 1 & 2 equipment for this snapshot.

5. The top panel (A) shows the Top five Assets by Failure Count.

In this screenshot, we are actually seeing the top 7 Asset IDs -- the reason why is because three of the machines are tied with 3 failures.  Since Failure Count is the primary sort criteria, you will see more than the 5 Assets as listed in the title.

6. By default, you are looking at the last six months of data for this panel.

This can be changed by adjusting the sliders.

7. Notice that each column has shading starting with white, moving from light yellow to gold, to lighter then darker red.  

  • One thing to note is that the column shading is relative to that specific column alone.  For example, the three Asset IDs with the longest downtime hours are FINN 5, FINN3 & CM05.
  • In this case, those also happened to have the most Failure counts, with FINN5 having the most at 7, the other two having 6.  This is not always the case.  
  • An example of this is next column over.  Although FINN5 has the most Reactive hours, the next two are TL1T and then FINN3.  CM05 has less than half of the reactive hours of the others.
  • And finally, if you were focusing on cost, or which parts to keep in stock, you would look at the FINNS -- FINN5 has over $31K in part usage over the last 6 months, FINN3 has over $24K and FINN4 has over $14K.

It seems pretty obvious that if you could only look at one machine, you might want to start with FINN5, however there are any number of reasons why you would want to look at one of the other machines listed above based on the information that is highlighted.

You can see that, depending on where you want to focus, there are a number of options where you can start.

The drill down and cross filtering options of Power BI will work in this report as well.  Click on a line in Chart A, and the reports from Charts B and C will adjust.

8. As an example, let's click on the first line, the FINN5 Data to see how the rest of the chart filters.

9. Notice that the second chart (Chart B) has now filtered to show just that asset with data from the last two weeks.

Notice that even though there were no breakdowns in the last two weeks, you still have about 9 1/2 hours of Reactive work and almost $800.00 in parts consumed.

If you wanted more information on the work order driving that information, you could either look in the Weekly or Daily FMS Metrics Report or you could search by the Equipment tab in eFACTORYPRO.

There are two halves to panel C.  This bottom screenshot shows what it would look like when filtered just for FINN5.

10. The left panel will show Downtime hours by Equipment Sub-Type.

11. The right shows downtime by OEM.  

This panel could be especially helpful if you have a number of different manufacturers at the site.

12. Panel C defaults to 12 Months of data, but can be adjusted by changing the slicer.

This report was specifically designed to be a "snapshot" -- to give you an "at a glance" place to start.  Don't forget that there are the Failure Analysis reports or the R360 App once you have a starting point.

There are many avenues available to help you improve performance.  

  • The Reliability Engineering Group
  • R360
  • Viewing/Editing Job Plans to ensure they cover failure reasons
  • Reviewing RCA Data
  • Reviewing/Copying Job Plans from other sites
  • Requesting Technician Feedback on Job Plans
  • Creating reusable job plans for standard work

The screenshot below shows how you might pull in information from the R360 App.

13. Go to the RCA Heatmap.

The data have been filtered to show the last six months and just for our single site.  Notice that the FINN5 info is the same, but you can see we the PM Compliance and Completion numbers are below goal.  

From here, you can investigate which PMS are being missed and why, as well as making sure that the proper steps are included on the Job Plan to help avoid these failures.

0 Comments

Add your comment

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Previous Article 7.10 Understanding the Layout of the Asset Performance Snapshot
Next Article 8.1 What do I need to understand about PM Metrics?